Re: [pakgrid] Re: ICT R&D Fund in trouble again (clarification)

 

kindly consider point 1 Critically (never advocating)... consider all other as one way depiction... eg NUST takes fund from -Indirectly PSF (autonomous body) -Travel grant&Research support activities -Indirectly PCSIR (autonomous body)-Printing Journals etc -Directly from MOST for Infrastructural adornment etc. -PCSIR and some others also generate funds themselves. while considering the primo thread...Secretary/ Rubber stamp is just nothing (Also take it critically)..as for as funding is concerned there is nothing in the hands of secretary.. kindest khurram    --- On Sat, 6/2/12, amjad ali <amjad11@gmail.com> wrote: From: amjad ali <amjad11@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pakgrid] Re: ICT R&D Fund in trouble again (clarification) To: pakgrid@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, June 2, 2012, 9:50 PM   Now I guess the person advocating about "... elected by people of Pakistan .... Parliamentary committee etc" would simply run away from this discussion.   This is a forum of scholars and intellectuals, with genuine arguments.   By the way, whenever I listen the words like "elected by people" then an immediate impression comes into my mind that something shit is going to be thrown in rest of the discussion.    My Lord, make us to walk on the right path. Wassalam Amjad Ali

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (22)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 20

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___