Re: [pakgrid] Re: Productive Scientists

 

Dear Ashiq,

I have no clue who's the gentleman and while it's true number alone don't define  the true effort or the quality but it's also true that sometimes you continue to publish small improvements, revisions, alight modification of previous research. Some people work with many smart researchers so it's all possible.

 

Best, Musstanser.

Sent from my iPhone.

On May 21, 2013, at 9:54 PM, "Dr Ashiq Anjum" <ashiq.anjum@cern.ch> wrote:

 

One gentleman produced 82 papers in 2011. This averages up to two papers in one week or roughly one paper in 3 days.

This includes the time to research a topic, do experimentation, get results, write up the findings, proof reading, quality assurance, discuss the results with colleagues, formatting...

How is this possible to do all these things in 3 days and then repeat the whole process 82 times in one year?

I believe quality has been ignored altogether while producing the list.

Best regards
Ashiq Anjum

--- In pakgrid@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. Arshad Ali" <arshad.ali@...> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Kindly find the web-link for List of Eligible Applicant for Research
> Productivity Allowance (RPA) for 2012.
>
> *
> http://www.pcst.org.pk/docs/LIST%20OF%20ELIGIBLE%20APPLICANTS%20FOR%20RPA%202012%20final.pdf
> *
> *
> *
> This can be accessed from PCST website: www.pcst.gov.pk
>
> It is interesting to see that none of the engineer falls in the research
> productivity list. Does that mean engineers are not contributing to the
> society or there is something wrong in the way we look at our research
> output.
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> Dr Arshad Ali, Prof & Principal
> NUST School of EE&CS
> Islamabad, Pakistan
>

__._,_.___

Reply via web post

Reply to sender

Reply to group

Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (10)

Recent Activity:

• New Members 5

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback

.

__,_._,___