Assalam o Alaikum - Dear All !
Without indulging into the argument of contributions by scientists and engineers, we should define productivity in the context of Pakistani requirements.Go for valuable entrepreneurship/products, not for invaluable allowances !
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Syed Husnine <syed.husnine@nu.edu.pk> wrote:
It is most likely that Engineers might not have applied for inclusion
in this list. This is the case with many scientists in other fields as
well.
S. M. Husnine> *
On 5/20/13, Dr. Arshad Ali <arshad.ali@seecs.edu.pk> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Kindly find the web-link for List of Eligible Applicant for Research
> Productivity Allowance (RPA) for 2012.
>
> http://www.pcst.org.pk/docs/LIST%20OF%20ELIGIBLE%20APPLICANTS%20FOR%20RPA%202012%20final.pdf
> *
> *> Dr Arshad Ali, Prof & Principal
> *
> This can be accessed from PCST website: www.pcst.gov.pk
>
> It is interesting to see that none of the engineer falls in the research
> productivity list. Does that mean engineers are not contributing to the
> society or there is something wrong in the way we look at our research
> output.
>
> Best regards
>
> --
> NUST School of EE&CS
> Islamabad, Pakistan
>
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (11) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment